Society is
always adapting and modifying to the environment around it. Technology has just
helped it along in the past century; our modern generation thrives on it. All
you need to do is step out of your home to see this. It’s impossible to go
almost anywhere and not see individuals using cell phones, driving in hybrid cars,
or listening to music through iPods, just to name a few. One of the most
powerful questions I have recently asked myself is; what did people do before the creation of the cell phone? Our
society has advanced past that point and going backward is not a feasible option
for most modern individuals. We see these small technological advances, but how
many individuals actually realize the cultural shifts as they are created and
used more often and are become more relied on? Society, culture and technology
are ever-evolving; the United States and the world benefits from it.
We see this in our American school
systems; 98% of schools in the United States have computers in their schools,
but the average ratio in 1997 of a student to a computer is 24 to 1, an
all-time low (Coley, Cradler, & Engel, 1997). This began changing
with the introduction to the one-to-one or laptop computer program that has
been crisscrossing our country since 2008 (Zucker & Light, 2009). These programs are
aimed to bring computers to every student in every school throughout the United
States, and those that have these programs, have seen an increase in their
academic scores. They have also seen an, “increase in student engagement,
improved technology skills and a positive effect on students’ writing” (Zucker & Light, 2009).
Some do not believe technology has
made our society better for all and this has seemed to create a block between
our society and some individuals, such as the American minorities and
immigrants. Gómez-Peña has partially addressed this issue within her essay, “The Virtual Barrio @ the Other Frontier”.
He states that the technological myth behind Mexicans and other Latinos in the
United States are that they are incapable of understanding high technology, and
that they are perceived by Americans as naïve within this category (Gómez-Peña, 2010). High Technology is
defined as: scientific technology
involving the production or use of advanced or sophisticated devices especially
in the fields of electronics and computers (Britannica). Gómez-Peña has a
unique perspective because he is Mexican-American, born in 1955 in Mexico City
and not moving to the United States until 1978, when he was 23 (Gómez-Peña, 2010).
Mexico is technologically
a poor country, especially in regards to computer and internet access; “Mexico
is lagging behind in the Internet age. Just 28 percent of the population has
Internet access. That puts Mexico behind Colombia, Brazil, Venezuela, Chile and
Argentina, where 30 percent to 40 percent of the population is connected
online” (Villigran, 2011). One conclusion a survey taken in 1996 established
that, “Students usually learn more in classes in which they receive
computer-based instruction” (Coley, Cradler, & Engel, 1997). This means most
Mexicans who grew up in Mexico would have a hard time learning or understanding
computers in the United States, since they did not grow up with them as U.S.
modern citizens have.
These tidbits of technological
statements are important, but not so much to others across the world. On
December 17, 2010, an Arab man in Tunisia, North Africa named, Mohamed Bouazizi
set himself on fire in front of the governor’s building in protest to
government policies (Cohen, 2011).
His protest was recorded on a cell phone and sent via Facebook, “Al-Jazeera,
the Arab TV network, was alerted through Facebook. Along the way, Bouazizi, who
did not even have a high-school diploma, cyber-morphed into a frustrated
university graduate: that resonated in a nation where many graduates are
jobless. This myth went round the world. Information moving this fast is
inspired, rather than bound, by facts” (Cohen, 2011).
This started the Middle Eastern riots that are still occurring today, now in
Egypt and Syria (Louis & Sabah, 2011).
Because one
man protested government rule, was recorded on a cell phone and sent to mass
viewing by wireless internet, the politics of the Middle East may never be the
same. This gives pause to think what
else technology may impact on other societies’ and cultures’ in the coming
years.
No comments:
Post a Comment